Can a landlord charge for scratches on hardwood or laminate floors?
Short answer
It depends
Light surface scratches and dulling from normal foot traffic are wear and tear, but deep gouges, pet scratches, or water damage a tenant caused can be a valid, often prorated, deduction.
Floors show their age. Fine surface scratches, minor scuffing, and a general loss of shine from walking, moving furniture carefully, and everyday living are normal wear a landlord shouldn't bill for. Refinishing a floor that's simply seen a few years of use is maintenance.
Real damage is chargeable: deep gouges from dragging furniture, extensive pet scratching, buckling from spills or overwatered plants left unaddressed, or sections that must be replaced. Because refinishing and board replacement are expensive, courts scrutinize these — proration for the floor's age and clear before/after evidence matter a lot.
Usually normal wear & tear
- ✓Fine surface scratches from foot traffic
- ✓Dulled finish over time
- ✓Minor scuffs near doorways
Often chargeable damage
- •Deep gouges from dragged furniture
- •Water damage or buckling from neglect
- •Extensive pet scratching
More deduction questions
This is general educational information about how normal wear and tear is typically distinguished from tenant damage — not legal advice. Deposit rules vary by state and locality; confirm your state's rules or consult a local attorney before relying on any specific deduction.